Chomsky, you are starting to look like the people you were speaking against 35-40 years ago.  You are now the old, bigoted man who isn’t interested in engaging dialogue of fact.

I started by emailing Chomsky, and inviting him to the April 5th premiere of Core of Corruption:

Noam-

…I have a documentary film series coming out this year, 5 parts, dealing with information I gathered over the last 10 years.  You were one of my primary influences and I have to say it, you were my influence to do what I am doing today.  The film series is very intense and each installment will be released 3 months or so apart from each other this year.

the reason I am contacting you is because I am holding a conference and premiere for the 1st installment of the series on April 5th and would love to have you as one of the speakers.  I admire your work and have read all your books.  My films are getting into length and detail on much of the same information and I credit you for this.  I would also like to sell your books on my website, if you can get me an exclusive discounted price.

So if I cover airfare and a place for you to stay, would you be available to come out to Denver, Colorado from April 4th – April 6th?  If you agree to this, I need to know how much time you need to conduct a presentation and if you need a projector screen or not, what materials, accommodations, etc.

Please contact me as soon as possible.

This was his reply:

Interested to hear about what you are doing.  Appreciate the invitation, but it’s hopeless, I’m afraid.  Completely tied up with talks right through that period.

My reply:

well I will send you a copy of the film to review.  The first 2 films will address Saudi Arabia and Pakistani involvement in 9.11, that being covered up, and how it is connected to the war on drugs (the war on terror) and so one and so fourth

His reply:

Thanks for the offer to send me the film.  Honesty requires me to tell you that it’s not worth it.  It’s years since I’ve had time to look at a film, and I don’t expect it to change in the foreseeable future.

My reply:

 I am glad that you express your honesty with me about why you can not review the film, due to your time priorities.

Please take the time to look at what I wrote about you and my critique of your work and response.  I copied and pasted the section in this email just below the link I provide.  I encourage you to find the time, which I know you could offer, to engage in my request to debate or discuss the matters I am putting fourth, which you seem to treat as absurd.  You are in a position of influence in this country and many people look up to you for your input on trivial issues, and when approached by those who are asking for your intellectual honesty and participation in society, you demonstrate, at least I show, a willful disregard for the truth and have misrepresented a pressing issue.  I will be addressing you and your work, as well as offering critical reviews of your completely incoherent, irresponsible and unacceptable reaction to the issue that is September 11th.  No, I am not a conspiracy theorist and am not one who pushes the “Inside Job” theory, but your failure to address, when requested upon, the quite simple review of readily available materials and information provided to you, even when offered for free, shows your lack of dependability to lead the intellectuals in any way.

If you so as try to address my information, I am more than confident that you will find yourself in an already embarrassing state of affairs.  Here is the link to my film’s website information,which I believe you are incapable of providing a respectable or comprehensible retort or argument against.  My study of which involved more than 7 years to assemble, provides the most credible of figures and witnesses to accompany an already impressive compilation of documented facts and established sources.

I challenge you to watch my film series which I guarantee you are incapable of addressing with objectivity.

http://coreofcorruption.com/index.php/?page_id=16

Being objective is a straightforward concept and does not include attacking the so called “truth movement” with name calling or insulting them or grouping them with other conspiracy theorists like people who believe there was no moon landing, r “tin foil hat wearers” or the such. None of this addressed or disproved the information but rather distracts the attention of those who take this serious and squanders critical and fundamental points made that need addressing.

Noam Chomsky

I for one was surprised to see that Noam Chomsky, a political activist and influential leader in American politics but who holds no credential holding him in a position to discredit any of the claims made by the movement, responded to a question raised by a 9/11 researcher about the claims that bombs may have been used on 9/11 and that Chomsky’s response was that the movement has no credentialed experts to back up the claim. I was shocked. An entire truth group filled with credentialed experts, government contractors, architects, engineers, physicists, professors, and even more qualified individuals was founded and has investigated this aspect of the attacks. His response was so ridiculous for he was willfully misrepresenting the group, Architects and Engineer’s for 9/11 Truth, by lying saying that anyone can get a degree in structural engineering online and so their opinion can immediately be thrown out of the window. If you see my film, I have a chapter that establishes without ANY SHADOW OF A DOUBT, that devices were found on 9/11, bombs were discovered, secondary explosions were established and that many of these were confirmed pre-placed explosives in the basements. Now I am not here to suggest who placed these or how they got there, and I do not see any evidence to suggest that this was the US Government; again, I am not a conspiracy theorist. I am not putting fourth any conspiracy theory, but presenting to you facts to be observed and for you to digest them on your own and decide for yourself.

But as for Chomsky’s completely ludicrous claim, here are three quick examples of “credentialed experts” that present the case for devices in the building on 9/11 I picked from the site, Architects and Engineer’s for 9/11 Truth, which has hundreds more that Chomsky clearly demonstrated his ignorance over. You can not get an “online degree” in engineering, first of all, but most of the members of the group are veteran experts.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect – Member, American Institute of Architects.  A practicing Architect for 20 years who has worked on most types of building construction including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings.  Founding member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

H. Theodore Elden, Jr., B.Arch, AIA – Practicing licensed architect in West Virginia for over 25 years.  Now retired.  Graduate of Carnegie Mellon University.  Member, American Institute of Architects, West Virginia Chapter.  Appointed Member of West Virginia State Board of Architects.  Former Member, National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB), and Member, National Committee, Intern Development Program for Architects (IDP).

Scott C. Grainger, BS CE, PE – Licensed Professional Civil Engineer and/or Fire Protection Engineer in the States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming.  Owner of Grainger Consulting, Inc., a fire protection engineering firm (23 years).  Former Chairman, Arizona State Fire Code Committee.  Former President of the Arizona Chapter of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers.  Current Member of the Forensic Sciences Committee and the Fire Standards Committee of ASTM International (formerly American Society for Testing and Materials ).  Senior Member, National Academy of Forensic Engineers.

There are thousands more.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth is a group of over 3,000 professionals and credentialed experts that question the collapses of the towers. Mike Berger’s “Improbable Collapse” and the AE 9/11 Truth Group’s documentary, “Blueprint for Truth” DVDs are available online and are excellent investigations into the towers collapses, to which many of the individuals in the truth movement believe are objective examinations.

I highly recommend Mike Berger’s Improbable Collapse, or the DVD offered from AE911truth.org.

You can get Mike Berger’s film at the following link:

 

 

 

http://www.improbablecollapse.com/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.ae911truth.org/

Again, you are doing a disservice to this country and should be ashamed of yourself for what you have failed to address.

His Reply:

If you had a critique of my work, I’d be more than glad to consider it. But you don’t.  Rather, what you have is a fabricated statement that you attributed to me on the basis of an e-mail — a rather odd source even if your reference were accurate, which it surely is not.  If you are interested in the facts, then read whatever e-mail you are relying on, or if that’s too much trouble, I’ll repeat to you exactly what I’ve responded to TMers, over and over.

Exactly why segments of the TM choose to behave in this fashion, I don’t know, and prefer not to speculate.  That’s for you to determine.

My reply:

My film and book does not discuss or entertain the “controlled demolition,” no planer, missile hit the pentagon or any other such ridiculous theories.  My work DOES NOT look at any of the clearly wasteful and fabricated information about 9/11 but does investigate the legitimate thread of information which follows the fact that Saudi Arabian Intelligence and Pakistani Intelligence were involved in the attacks, this is documented and confirmed, even by credible news outlets as I show in my film, and the commission report chose to ignore this involvement by them and claimed no foreign governments were involved in 9/11.

As for the other information I get into, I suggest you do a little more research about FBI Agent Sibel Edmonds, FBI Agent Robert Wright, FBI Informant Randy Glass, Lt Col Anthony Shaefer, CIA Analyst Ray McGovern, Lt Col Bob Bowman, Dr. Daivd Graham, Indira Singh, Richard Grove, FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, FBI Agent Harry Samit, and many more that well establish that there was prior knowledge, complicity and potential orchestration of levels of 9/11 by private sector fronts working with individuals in and outside of intelligence and military, as well as government.  Very compartmentalized, however, this information is not given any attention because the so called “truth movement” is filled with lunatics, misinformation and disinformation which is misdirecting people away from legitimate and credible journalists and investigators like myself.

there are two videos online where you responded with your statement about the “truth movement.”  I invite and have invited you to look at my work and you refuse.  This is not a matter or you assuming I speculate, when you admit you choose not to even look at my work.  This is not a complicated thing.

Do not throw me in some stereotype you made of a “movement” which is made up of people who don’t agree with each other, it makes you look prejudice.  If you want to debate me, I invite this in person and on April 5th.  If you want to refute or debate my work, than do so.  Until then, when you say you don’t have time to look at my film, stereotype me and throw me in a group of people I disagree with fundamentally, then you look like the person who has a willful disregard for the truth and you demonstrate a lack thereof to give your explanation that i do not have facts.

You haven’t looked at my work, yet you make the accusation that I either speculate or have no facts.  Do you see how ridiculous this looks for you or not?  When you are ready to engage my work, I’d appreciate it.  Until then, as a person who has such influence in society to willfully misrepresent a movement by saying there are no “credible people” behind the bombs in the building theory of 9/11, when there is (Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth) plus in my film which is surfacing over 200 news clips that have not been seen since they aired, I show in my film that bombs were found, discovered and confirmed on 9.11.  What I DO NOT say is that this proves it was a US Government operation.  There is a difference.

Again, you assume much about someone you have never met.  I spent 5 years on this project and I assure you that you will respect my work, if you choose to give it the time of day, but I warn you , DO NOT attempt to associate me with the truth movement or the “truthers.”

I base your accusations off of readily available videos on the internet where you are clearly saying things that mis-represent the movement itself.

It must first be clarified that when referring to a group of people that are loosely affiliated because of a common interest or concern, such as questioning an event like 9/11, it isn’t fair or accurate to describe any one person in that group, or one group of the many groups as either a representative of the whole or that what they say is what all the members believe. The 9/11 truth movement is not in any sense, or have they agreed upon, a universal explanation of what happened that day. They are split up between people who are concerned with physics, people who are concerned with prior knowledge or forewarning of the attacks, people who are concerned with negligence, people who are concerned with complicity, people who are concerned with orchestration and even people who are confident of their theories. A few individuals in the movement who do not populate the majority or reflect the opinions and beliefs of the rest of the movement have been, ironically, the only few invited on to the mainstream platform to which they are presented as representatives of the whole movement. To this, some argue this might be a campaign that has been attempting to discredit the competent members who have serious questions. In the case of the 9/11 commission, it is different in relation to think of one of them as a representative of the whole because in that case, they all agree at the end to present a shared thesis and produce a final report, to which they all sign their names to.

Those who are not familiar with the movement rarely are aware that it is made up of Family members of victims of September 11. One group in particular is called the Family Steering Committee, also known as the Jersey Girls or the 9/11 Press for Truth group.

The 9/11 commission was setup over a year after the initial Congressional Inquiry into the attacks was released after family members of victims of September 11th demanded a new investigation. Like the 1st investigation, the majority of the questions the family members raised were never answered or even asked by the 9/11 commission. Some of the widows of 9/11 victims went public stating that they now wanted the press to pursue the truth about 9/11.

Their story has rarely been heard and is blacked out of establishment media reports.

On 9/11/2006, 9/11 Family members along with Kyle Hence (Executive Producer of 9/11: Press For Truth), and Paul Thompson (www.historycommons.org, author of “The Terror Timeline”), called for a new investigation at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. This was the only news outlet to cover the unprecedented event in the United States. Over the years, different family members like Bob McIlvaine, Lorie Van Auken, Daniel Wallace (RIP), Barry Zelman, Manny Badillo, and Patrick Welsh have spoken out for the truth. The September Eleventh Advocates have released letter after letter after letter after letter after letter after letter after letter after letter after letter after letter after letter trying to get some truth. The media has been silent.

Pilots for 9/11 truth is a group that has examined the aviation related information of the official story and found startling contradictions and errors. For instance, the fact that the NTSB, which is required by law to investigate all airplane crashes, never investigated any of the 4 planes on 9/11. They also found that even though reports of the blackboxes being found in the crash sites were aired on media outlets, the official story claims to have only retrieved 1. Flight paths, crash site evidence and radar information for the flights is under scrutiny for a number of reasons.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth is a group of over 3,000 professionals and credentialed experts that question the collapses of the towers. Mike Berger’s Improbable Collapse and the AE 9/11 Truth Groups documentary, Blueprint for truth dvds are available online and are excellent investigations into the towers collapses, to which many of the individuals in the truth movement believe are objective examinations.

Scholars for 9/11 truth and Justice is made up of professors and academic intellectuals who have examined many aspects of the attacks and concluded that the official stories are not just in contradiction to each other, but fail to reflect even official mainstream and credible media reporting that proves elements of the official version are incorrect. Even testimonies from members of the government at the 9/11 commission hearings were omitted or not applied to the final reports, as well as documents and archived evidence.

We Are Change is an international activist group started by luke rudkowski which encourages confronting figures in the establishment that are related to the 9/11 incident and discussing these issues, and also covers many other pressing issues. Radio talk show host and reporter Alex Jones of infowars.com and prisonplanet.com produced a movie titled, 9/11 Chronicles: Truth Rising, which cover’s Luke’s story and the movement.

There are countless 9/11 truth groups in almost every major city. 911Truth.org was the earliest and founding group which was and remains a key player in the movement’s organization. Recently, Firefighters for 9/11 truth was founded.

Lawyers for 9/11 Truth is out there

Firefighters for 9/11 Truth is out there

But if you are looking for more CREDIBILITY, then check out Patriots Question 9/11

PS – Again, I invite you for a sivil debate and I hope you engage me in dialogue in public.  I soon will be visiting you on my tour and doing so whether you accept my invitation so I suggest doing it on stage and we can have it filmed.  I really want to see if you can hold up in a debate against me on this issue, which has brought me through hundreds of offices and credible witnesses, governement employees and introduced me to people in black ops.  When I spent time in the Israeli Military, I had the chance of learning a lot about terrorism, and about its relation with drug running.  I also am familiar with drug running and its relation with the intelligence agencies.  Now either you can put 2 adn 2 together, or you can’t.  If you shoose to accept this invitation, I will fly you out first class and pay for your hotel.  We will air the debate on local television, but also release the debate online where it will also be streaming live.  I await your response

His reply:

I’ll be happy to respond as soon as you deal with the fabricated statement you attributed to me, which was the basis for your article and your letter.  You can deal with that honestly in two ways: (1) by identifying the source (not with a vague reference to something on Youtube), or (2) withdrawing the charge (and an apology would be in order, though that’s your business).

In this letter you do not do either, but rather evade the topic completely with statements that are utterly irrelevant to your charge, to which I responded.

You’re right that I’m unfamiliar with your work.  That’s why I do not write articles harshly condemning you on the basis of statements that I fabricate, or write you insulting letters based on nothing but my own fabrications, or those I may have picked up from others.
I’m sorry that you do not seem to understand any of this, but I am afraid that is not my problem.

My lateset email reply:

I have a short video made about the truth movement that I also include addressing the “Debunking” and “skeptics” as well as people like you.  In fact, I have used this email exchange as the source for much of the needed work to show that you are exactly as I assumed you were going to be.

I assume you are more familiar with your own words, and don’t need people to hold your hand while crossing the street anymore but, wow, this is really going to be embarrassing for you again.  I have not “fabricated” anything.  here you go:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9216919997676165205&ei=s0GvSb2KHYaIqQPGmbUL&q=chomsky+9%2F11
In the video above, which I have downloaded and backed up for record keeping purposes, I quote you, with the times identified:

At 26 seconds in you state:

(Chomsky) “I don’t think much of them”

& At 34 seconds in you state

(Chomsky) “Its not only a huge industry but its a fanatic industry”

(My Response) again, if you read my response you are stereotyping and insulting fellow professors, scientists, FBI agents, whistleblowers, firefighters, witnesses, and family members, people from different areas and foundations and fields of expertise.  To suggest that somehow these people are fanatic is not scientific, it is willfully misrepresenting them.  You can say I am “fabricating” these things you said, but you say such ignorant things about a group of people who do NOT believe in a theory but stand together in questioning the events.  They are separated by different groups, complicity, negligence, orchestration and incompetence.  The evidence for each of these is there, hence the reasons so many millions have given it the time of day you choose not to yet share you insulting and ignorant views on.  Say what you will Noam, but if you want to debate 9/11, lets go fact by fact, otherwise don’t say anything about these people you know nothing about having not looked at their information and reject it when confronted with it.  It only makes you look like a bigot

At 53 seconds in you state:

(Chomsky) “…the 9/11 truth people…so it’s kind of a religion this fanaticism, almost.”

(My Response) where is your basis for this?  So one person who might be harassing you, or perhaps many, regardless, represents the movement in some way?  If someone from the “civil rights” movement or many people harassed you would you refer to the civil rights movement this way?  Assuming that the information is legitimate, again, which you refuse to disprove directly but rather make condescending remarks towards, and then wouldn’t this information be important enough to want to get behind?  You really question the devotion a human being has to activism behind 9/11 truth, without getting into whether you believe it or not, hypothetically speaking if it is true, you really question their being so devoted to wanting justice or getting you behind it?  Really?  This is fanaticism?  Assuming its all true, which to my research many of their questions are legitimate, we are naturally going to respond this way.  This is not just something “crazy” people do, Noam, it is a natural response to the information for human beings if it is so believed to be true.  Not religious following, but concern for justice.  Don’t insult and condescend the movement as your basis of disproving them, go off their specific facts.  And understand that they have made it clear that there are people who have entered into their movement, long after it was established, that have said the most outlandish of things that the founding and populate majority of the movement does not say, yet these lunatics are the ones out there harassing everyone trying to claim they “represent” the movement.   That is convenient.  But someone like you, I would assume, should be able to determine the difference between one person’s thoughts and words, versus going to the websites of the many different truth groups, hearing their information directly, and judging it at that point.  You have not bothered to give them theories any look yet have an opinion on them.  I find this surprising, because you bother to share your ignorant statements with the world before addressing directly the issues at hand, and I can make them point by point if you’d like.  Again, like I said, I invite you to a debate.  Either you choose to accept or continue to hide behind your little desk and stay quiet in this raging debate in the world, which you act as if it is a “religious” fanaticism.  Please, Noam, don’t waste everyone’s time with your ignorant, outsider statements.  Address directly, or keep your opinions to yourself if they are that smelly.  And don’t be surprised that you are attack for this, because many of us have actively investigated this information and found that YES, the official story is a lie and cover up, which goes to the extent of covering up substantial insider involvement with private sector and government officials.  Now, does this mean that this was done on behalf of the US Government or George Bush?  NO, and the movement is not saying that.  If someone is saying this to you then you are, again, wasting your time with someone NOT from the movement but someone who probably hasn’t done any research themselves and regurgitates whatever nonsense they hear already.

At 1:10 in you say,

(Chomsky) “Can you become a qualified, highly qualified mechanical and civil engineer and expert in the structure of buildings in a couple of hours on the internet,… and if you really believe any of this evidence then there is an easy way to proceed go to specialists who evaluate it.  Not, you may of found one physicist somewhere, uh, but go to the civil and mechanical engineering departments.”

(My Response) Well again Noam, you say such ignorant things it makes those of intelligence question perhaps your age is tampering with your mind, sir.  NO, you can not become a “highly qualified mechanical and civil engineer and expert in the structure of buildings in a couple of hours on the internet.”  There is no evidence for this, and again, if you’d BOTHERD to go to Architects and Engineer’s for 9/11 Truth and watch their DVD or watch Improbable Collapse by Mike Berger, than you wouldn’t say such things because most of the mechanical and civil engineering departments ARE BEHIND THIS at this point.  There are over 3,500 credentialed experts in the group from across the world.  I’d say that is not a “fanaticism” or ‘religion” Noam, I’d say there must be something there convincing people it is legitimate.  Again, many of these people are veteran experts, not “internet” phonies as you so baseless accuse them of being, which again, is the most absurd and ignorant thing ever uttered out of your mouth and you should be ashamed of yourself of talking in this manner of lies and ignorance.  You hold a position of influence in this society, how DARE YOU even suggest these things of your fellow scientists and professors without having the balls or the brains to actually LOOK at what they are saying and debate them directly, instead, like a complete and categorically ignorant person, you choose to make baseless and blatantly false statements about people you know nothing about and choose NOT to look into.  Like you accuse me of fabricating this, well Noam, NO, you said these things and they were blatantly and patently false.  You lied.  You misrepresented and willfully and ignorantly said some of the most ridiculous things.

Now, if I may continue showing you that I did not FABRICATE these things, as you accuse me of, but rather was insulted that you would say these lies about your fellow scientific community when you know NOTHING of their nature of intent, I would like to continue to show you how ignorant your statements are and continue to look:

At 1:53 in you say:

(Chomsky) “in fact it is treated very sympathetically by power centers,”

(My Response) Ok, again, no it is not.  For the most part, there is a media black out.  Here is a short list of all of the attempted disclosure, panel or calls for investigation that you say are treated sympathetically by the establishment, when IN REALITY where I am, there was a media black out.  Look at for example the fact that two people called out the attacks, predicted them, that they would “blame” an attack on Bin Laden and they made this prediction months before 9/11 because they were following the information

-Bill Cooper Predicts 9/11 in June of 2001 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPcia9hQohY

-Alex Jones Predicts 9/11 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8Hk1-BpXO8

Many events have taken place to bring this information to the public.  Hearings, disclosures, debates, petitions, marches, conferences and conventions all have taken place since 2001 and in every case were an attempt to raise awareness of 9/11.  The media was contacted in all of these events and in some cases these stories were told by the press.  C-Span and local television stations were somewhat common, but network news was utterly silent.  Some of these events include:

1. “The Truth and Lies of 9/11″ Portland University, November 2001.  ex-LAPD narcotics officer and author Michael Rupport raised many of the questions about the attacks.  Ruppert was one of the first investigative reporters to detail insider trading and wargames which took place on 9/11.

2. What most do not know is that the truth movement is largely credited with having been started by the family members of the victims of 9/11.  The Families rallied for an investigation after the Congressional Inquiry was initially released, chaired by Porter Goss, Bob Graham and Nancy Pelosi among others.  Bush originally limited the scope of the investigations which took place and was reluctant to have another investigation.  Once the family members received press coverage and campaigned for a new investigation, the 9/11 commission was finally setup over a year after the attacks but was with much restraint.

3. A large truth march took place in San Francisco to the support families in 2002.

4. 9/11 CitizensWatch was formed and 9/11 Family Steering Committee to monitor the 9/11 Commission

5. Campaign was initiated to shame 9/11 Commissioners into having people under oath, which was not being done.  In fact, the request was made by the family members and the commission to have President Bush and Dick Cheney testify publicly and separately.  The two refused to cooperate and instead testified together, not under oath, in secret closed door meetings with a few commissioners.

6. “Reframing 9/11″ (Sept. 11-14, 2003): Four-day conference at Manhattan’s Riverside Church, sponsored by WBAI-FM. 2500 people came to hear 30-plus 9/11 experts, scholars, journalists, and movement leaders to discuss the questions and conspiracy

7. Unanswered Questions-Demanding Answers” (Berlin International 9/11 Summit, Sept. 7, 2003): a thousand people including reporters from the entirety of the German mass media turned out to hear experts discuss the evidence of a conspiracy as well.

8. May, 2004:  International Citizens Inquary into 9/11 held in Toronto, Canada

9. 9/11 CitizensWatch had a press conference in June 2004 to discuss the reports conclusions

10. San Francisco 9/11 Inquiry was held in mid 2004

11. “Dude, There’s More to the Story” (June 2004): Mass national leafleting of Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 9/11″ on its debut at theaters across the US and Canada, urging viewers to learn about the issues that Moore’s film did not approach and to get involved with 911Truth.org.

12. DNC “Expose the 9/11 Cover-Up” (July 2004, Boston): Workshops and teach-ins, thousands of signs and flyers given to activists who gathered for the Democratic Party convention.

13. “Summer of Truth 2004″ (Aug. 2004, New York City) : A series of breakthrough events, that began with a week full of protests and teach-ins during the Republican National Convention and culminated with the 9/11 Citizens’ Commission (“The Omissions Hearings”) on Sept. 9 and the massive “Confronting the Evidence” show on Sept. 11 (the latter co-organized with Walden Three). These drew thousands of participants and led to a massive expansion of activist involvement in the most crucial of all locations for the movement.

14. 9/11 Omission Hearings held in New York 9/9/2004

15. 9/11 People’s Commission held in Washington D.C. 9/11/2004

16. “Globalize 9/11 Truth” (October, 2004): Campaign delivered 9/11 info flyers to all permanent UN missions and got thousands worldwide to contact them and urge pursuit of 9/11 truth.

17. 2005… Emergency Truth Convergence in D.C. 7/23/2005… 9/11 Congressional Briefing chaired by Cynthia McKinney on 7/22/2005 in D.C.

18. 9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming our Future… Chicago June 2006 with hundreds of credible and established leaders and public figures including Dr Martin Luther King’s life long friend and attorney, Dr. William Pepper

19. June 25, 2006:  9/11 Scholars Symposium.  A distinguished panel including scientists, historians, terrorism experts, and experienced military personal analyzed disturbing evidence that 9/11 might have been an inside job.  Originally broadcast on C-Span.

20. 9/11: Families, Responders, and Researchers Speak Out … West Hartford Symposium Nov 2007

21. – 24. every single year on 9/11, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 there took place a truth march in New York, where thousands marched and protested.  A complete media blackout on it.

25. Feb. 2007 – 9/11 Accountability Conference in Arizona

26. Richard Gage, Architect Speaks Out, April, 2007 and has been touring the country since starting his group, in fact has been to Denver twice recently and is about to come back on April 5th for the event I invited you to that you refused to attend

27. January 14, 2008:  Japan Questions 9/11 and the Global War on Terror.  Testimony in the Japanese parliament, broadcast live on Japanese television in January 2008, challenged the premise and validity of the Global War on Terror. Parliament member Yukihisa Fujita insisted that an investigation be conducted into the war’s origin: the events of 9/11.

     In a parliament Defense and Foreign Affairs Committee session held to debate the ethics of renewing Japan’s “anti-terror law,” which commits Japan to providing logistical support for coalition forces operating in Afghanistan, Fujita opened the session by stating, “I would like to talk about the origin of this war on terrorism, which was the attacks of 9/11, . . . When discussing these anti-terror laws we should ask ourselves, what was 9/11? And what is terrorism?”

      Fujita pointed out that, “So far the only thing the government has said is that we think it was caused by Al-Qaeda because President Bush told us so. We have not seen any real proof that it was al-Qaeda.” He reminded parliament that twenty-four Japanese citizens were killed on 9/11, yet the mandate of a criminal investigation by the Japanese government never followed. “This is a crime so surely an investigation needs to be carried out,” said Fujita (Censored 2008, #16).

28. 9/11 Truth Debate at European Parliament, February 26, 2008

29. June 2008. Bliar Gatsby holds a hunger strike in front of McCain’s offices in Arizona over 9/11 truth exposure.

30. The Spitzer Complaint: “Justice for 9/11″ – In 2004 the staff and board members of 911Truth.org researched, wrote and presented a complaint to New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, petitioning him to immediately convene a grand jury on the still-unsolved crimes of September 11th, 2001. Advised by Attorney Carolyn Betts, we published this thorough, well-grounded legal pleading at www.Justicefor911.org , in a partnership with 911CitizensWatch and the World Trade Center Environmental Organization. Unlike other states, New York allows no formal process for filings with the Attorney General. Given that Spitzer was unwilling to even talk about a new investigation, and has now become Governor of New York, “Justice for 9/11″ is as much a public campaign as a legal one. The Petition of Solidarity in support of the complaint currently stands at 15,000 confirmed signatories.

Moving on -

For this next quote of yours, I am going to respond in BOLD to your statements one at a time and then continue back on with your quote.

At 1:58 in you say:

(Chomsky) “Why is it treated sympathetically?  I think they like it.” 

(My Response) What are you talking about?  I can show you video clip after video clip of attacks and name calling and intimidation towards the truth movement when or if it has even been allowed coverage.  It receives virtually no objective, sympathetic or impartial coverage

(Chomsky) “It’s diverting enormous amounts of energy away from real crimes of the administration, which are far more serious, even if what they’re accused of with 9/11. Suppose they blew up the World Trade Center, by their standards that’s a minor crime…”

(My Response) Excuse me?  How is this diverting attention away from crimes when this is centered on the biggest crime in US history?  What we are talking about here, Noam, is mass murder.  Terrorism against our own people, something every empire and government at one time or another has done, but in a post-cold war world, where black operations have become so sophisticated, the blowing up of a building is, while sounding very hard, actually requiring a small amount of planning but with exclusive access and privileges to the buildings.  Securicom was the company that did security personnel for the world trade center and up until 1999, the board that ran the company included Marvin Bush, the ex-president’s younger brother who shortly after 9/11 had a death at his home, Bertha Campagne, the 62 year old house maid was pinned up against the wall on the side his garage by her own car and it was ruled an accident. Not to mention that Securicom is owned by Kuwaiti American Corporation.  And Security systems at the World Trade Center were Kroll Associates, the company that subcontracts for the secret service and is the largest private intelligence firm.  And Kroll is intimately connected with Marsh McLennan am AIG, which according to Richard Grove, the famous whistle blower, was the CIA front that laundered drug money, specifically the money that Mohammed Atta was involved in when investigative reporter Daniel Hopsicker uncovered that Atta was running Heroin with CIA agents, and all the Heroin in the word comes from Afghanistan.  And I can continue down this thread and show you just how real the possibility that there were bombs in those buildings, but instead, I am going to establish in my film, using credible news clips, all the devices hat were found on 9/11, again, if you watch it, which I believe you have the expectation from others and the responsibility to do so at this point because you have so much as shared your opinions about a movement that is, for the most part, based on legitimate concern and as one myself in the movement, and knowing hundreds in Colorado in the movement, NO ONE is in any category or description you place the,  Your rude, and ignorant insults waste everyone’s time.  Again, either look at the information directly, watch my movie, and respond, or don’t bother talking at all because you are choosing to place yourself in a place of certainty about an issue you also have no hesitation to admit you know nothing about, take no time to look into, etc.  I got off the phone with Richard Gage, the 25 year architect that founded Architects and Engineer’s for 9/11 Truth and he said he also invited you to his event, and you refused to go.  I think your weasel and cowardly behavior to not attend our events, watch our movies, directly address one of us, or return an invitation to a debate speaks for yourself and the world sees you for what you are, a fake.  I once had a lot of trust in you, but you sold out a long time ago.  I don’t know when, but clearly, you are a sellout.  Back to your incoherent thread of nonsense from that Google video link you claimed I “fabricated”

(Chomsky) “They’re committing real crimes.  As long as they are directing, and there’s very little protest about them,”

(My Response) Very little protest about them?  What planet are you on?  We have been told we should be placed in “camps” as well as been given the privilege of being told that we should be taken into the streets and shot.  Again, you misrepresent the facts.  I made a video for this entire response that will address you many times, I suggest you watch as I am campaigning actively for real justice about 9/11 and addressing those who have lied to the people on this path which include you, Howard Zinn, the majority of the “neocon right wing,” Popular Mechanics, BBC, History Channel, Skeptic Magazine and many more.

(Chomsky) “one of the reasons is, not the only one of course, that an enormous amount of potential activist energy is directed into this.  So from their point of view it’s great, we’ll give them exposure on C-Span, you know, have their books right up front of local bookstores, a pretty tolerant reaction, I mean, we sort of say we think its a bad joke, but you know you don’t get the kind of reaction you do when you really go after, uh, you know hard issues, the way the government behaves…” 

(My Response) Hard issues?  9/11 being complicit by US Government and US private Sector individuals as well as intelligence agencies is no a hard issue?  There has NEVER been a book store I have ever been to that has place any one of the books about 9/11 truth or one that questions the event “right p at the front.”  Can you give any examples of this?  I have seen these books, in fact buried in special interest.  They are not given the merit of being placed in their proper categories

(Chomsky) “So it’s a terrible drain of energy away from much more serious problems.  The evidence, I don’t think the people presenting the evidence are even in a position to evaluate it.” 

(My Response) FBI Agents, CIA Analysts, DIA officials, Whistleblowers from all over the government make up the information I present in my film that I have seen from the movement.  Wall street players I interviewed, the insider trading related to 9/11 which took place and was reported on by the mainstream media, was connected to the money laundering of heroin drug money right on wall street, all reported in the media, the truth movement addresses this as do I in my film with reputable sources and credible information.  Are you sure you want to make the statement that any of these people are in a position to evaluate the evidence?  At least with the bombs in the buildings information, well, again, I don’t think you could fins any better than physicists, engineers, architects and even a whistle blower from Underwriter Labs, Kevin Ryan, who blew the whistle on the faulty 9/11 investigation into the towers collapses.  If you so much as watch my film, you will see all of these answers you pretend you already know, but instead disseminate disinformation to the people

(Chomsky) “Uh it’s a hard technical question most of these things.  What doesn’t seem to be understood is that there’s a reason that scientists do experiments, they don’t just take video tapes of what’s happening out the window,” 

(My Response) You are right.  And this was done. Steven Jones, professor of physics at BYU conducted these experiments, as did Kevin Ryan.  In fact, if you’d bother to, like I said, just go on over there to the Architects and Engineer’s for 9/11 truth site, or if you’d bother to watch their movie which is readily available, then you would know that experiments were done.  Of course, you don’t know any of these things, because it is clear you have never looked into 9/11 seriously.

(Chomsky) “the reason is because whets happening out the window involves so many variables, you don’t understand, that you’re just getting a mess.  You can find all kinds of unexplained coincidences, unexplained violations of the laws of nature in anything.  Even in controlled experiments there are plenty of problems.  You read the letter’s columns of science journals there are plenty of examples.  So the fact that you are finding this happened and that happened doesn’t say anything.” 

(My Response) Except the fact that this is just a blanketed and cliché thing to say and doesn’t address or attempt to directly disprove any one argument put fourth by the members in the credible positions that have done so and stated very clearly, the evidence for explosive devices and thermite have been confirmed by scientific studies, peer review papers, recreated experiments, eye-witness testimony, independent and major establishment investigations and also my film, which more than answers all of these questions you have given false answers to.  It is only a few hours, I suggest you watch it for you will need to be more prepared next time someone confronts you about 9/11, because if it is anything like this interview was, you can be expected to be confronted again and again because, if you would bother to look at this hypothetically being true in your mind for a minute, this is not about religious fanaticism, its about people who are convinced their government covered up the mass murder of 3,000 innocent lives and may have been involved in the attacks, which lead of course to all the policy changes and expansionism that benefited the western establishment, not to mention 2 illegal wars and over a million dead from fighting including women and children.  Do you honestly believe that these people are fanatics for this kind of reaction, which isn’t by the way anything like you make it out to be?  All of the 9/11 truth events I have attended and the majority of the people I have encountered have not been anything more than regular people or intellects like yourself.  I think that you mischaracterize the movement which you have taken no time to engage

At 5:40 in you state:

(Chomsky) “…and in fact the whole idea completely lacks credibility.  I mean anything, if there were any truth to this, it would be a huge conspiracy, the airline industries, the media to fake the planes, a lot of people in the administration would of have to of known, it’s a very chancy operation, you never know what’s going to happen.  The chance of a leak are pretty high, and even the slightest leak these guys would be lined up before firing squads and it’s the end of the Republican Party forever.  Gaining what?”

(My Response) Oh where to begin with all the completely ridiculous things in this quote.  First of all, as shown to this point it is very credible.  Go to www.patriotsquestion911.com and see for yourself all of the credibility you need.  And no, compartmentalized events took place on 9/11, that’s why it happens.  It almost sounds like you deny that it took place.  Remember, 9/11 did happen, all that the movement is saying is asking questions about factors on that day, like air response failures, prior knowledge, and small things.  Some people in the movement are talking about a highly compartmentalized operation of pre-placed explosives, but as you seen in my film Core of Corruption, there were device found on 9/11 in the towers so quit wasting everyone’s time, Chomsky, by saying that the idea lacks credibility because it would have to be a “conspiracy.”  You’re right.  It would.  That’s exactly what it means, doesn’t it.  Do you think these things happen on their own?  So you are surprised to see that wait a second, if this were true, it would mean that “people would have had to have committed it and it would be a big conspiracy” when in reality, it doesn’t take but just 1 person at a high level to be involved for their to be significant affects that alter 9/11.  For instance, look at the air defense failures that day.  Jon Gold wrote his famous “The Facts Speak for Themselves”, which you can view by clicking here and I suggest you attempt to explain them, Noam.  Why would a lot of people in the administration would have known?  Haven’t you ever heard of the continuity of government?  A very small group of people can manage to do whatever they please so long as they control the investigation into it.  You are placing too much competence in the government.  Remember, the government is too incompetent to get anything done remember, but the military, ah ha, the CIA, aha ha, these are precision expert people who don’t play around and you should know better.  All you would need is, since our system defines compartmentalized duties to everything, a few sectors at the top to be disoriented or distracted and there you go.  Well what is the evidence on 9/11, all these war games?  If you don’t know what I am talking about, again, in my second film I get into this.  As for the odds of a leak being pretty high, you are actually right on this one, but again, since you fail to research 9/11 you aren’t familiar, like all the “debunkers” with the numerous whistle blowers from the various agencies about prior knowledge, negligence or complicity in the attacks.  There are over 27 of them, again, I have mentioned them in this email, and you can see them in my film series.  I interviewed all of them.   And no, big conspiracy like this have happened, mass murder and not much has been done.  History is filled with conspiracies; don’t pretend like they don’t exist.

At 6:20 you state:

(Chomsky) “It just doesn’t make any sense.”

(My Response) No, Noam, you don’t make any sense.  This entire rebuttal has made perfect sense; can you make sense of it now?

At 6:32 you state:

(Chomsky) “There’s nothing in history that is even remotely comparable to this.  And there’s a good reason, you could never get away with it.”

(My Response) First of all, yes, mass murder of the people by the government has happened all the time in MUCH WORSE scenarios with the full knowledge, support openly or quietly and even participation in the mass exterminating of people.  One generation ago was the holocaust.  That is NOTHING, compared to this.  What planet are you living on?  Yes, people are capable of doing a lot worse.  9/11 involved a much more detached sense of destruction if any person was involved because they didn’t have to specifically fly those planes into the towers, hijackers did for them.  Getting the hijackers here, protecting them, and aiding them.  All if this was established in the “Abel Danger” scandal which broke years back.  Again, WATCH MY FILM; I get into all of these things.  And as for getting away with it, you are right about this.  They would never get away with it, THAT’S WHY THEY ARE BEING CONFRONTED.  Why the heck do you think all these people won’t shut up?  You not listening to them because of your ignorance, which I have pointed out you know JACK about 9/11 truth, is not proving to me anything but that you are failing at listening to the people right now.  1/3 of the country are on board, WHERE ARE YOU!?  Come on!  This is ridiculous.  There are hundreds of thousands of people who are trying to do something about this because they believe that 9/11 shouldn’t have been something that “they” got away with, like you said, “they” wouldn’t have gotten away with it, well that just proves my point further.  Whoever “they” is (if you bother to listen to the credible members of the movement, we don’t speculate who and have NEVER suggested BUSH) All you are doing at this point is proving me now.  Because they didn’t get away with it, these 9/11 truthers will not shut up and will not go away but will only get louder, and you need to understand this because the sooner you do, the more progressive I will believe you “really” are.  Progress means that you listen to people at the very least, not site back ad call them names and make silly, incoherent arguments that misrepresent a competent movement

At 6:43 you state:

(Chomsky) “It would be exposed in no time”

(My Response) You are right, it was.  We were out there ALMOST immediately.  Where were you?  Apparently you live on another planet these days.  Why don’t you try living on this one for a few weeks and get back in touch with the people, when you do, call me, because you have a lot of catching up to do?  You are COMEPLETELY out of touch with reality on this one Chomsky.

At 8:06 you talk about the internet having a “downside”

(Chomsky) “…One person puts up a theory on a blog and it has a minimal credibility and five other people see it and they say “yeah maybe” and then they build it up a little and pretty soon you get exponential growth and you have a huge industry reinforcing itself…There are many of these around, the “9/11” is one of them, but there re plenty of others.”

(My Response) Ok, well, I agree this happens.  But “the 9/11;” what do you mean by that?  That is about as vague as you can be, Noam.  Please don’t humor me with this one.  This is your argument; “The 9/11” is one of them?  Actually, again as you can see in my film series or just go to my website and view my trailers, I surfaced all the credible and reputable news stories from mainstream video news networks.  As for your yet again, misrepresentation that the “9/11,” whatever this is supposed to be speaking about in general, has mostly used official sources to base its claims.  Again, if you’d bother to watch any of the films I suggest or go to the websites I suggest instead of picking and choosing which 9/11 sites you think are populated, ask the truth movement what they think and they will tell you, www.historycommons.org is the place.  There, like in the book, “The Terror Timeline,” by Paul Thompson, you can see the thousands of credible news stories that the community has put together and organized and a neat database that is easily searchable where you can see just about anything you want reported form the mainstream media, with citations, that discredits the official story substantially, proves prior knowledge, levels of negligence or complicity and some even suggest levels of orchestration.   Again, go to the site or buy The Terror Timeline, and quit lying to people about the 9/11 truth movement and start listening to them.

At 9:40 you state:

(Chomsky) “…Well I can prove that uh, you know I can become a qualified civil engineer in an hour, and then I can prove that BUSH blew up the World Trade Center, meanwhile I am pretty sure that in Washington they must be clapping”

(My Response) No, you can not.  No, no one has ever.  You can not give an example for this because it has not happened.  Again, the FOUDNING 9/11 truth groups and the populated and majority of the movement has not and continues to not say or suggest what they think happened, let alone put fourth that “bush was behind it.”  Either you represent truth here or you represent some blog that no one pays attention to.  Get in reality, Chomsky.  Go to a 9/11 truth event, you’ve been invited and you turn it down.  You have been requested to critique work and turned it down yet you do not hesitate to give your ignorant opinions about this movement you have never engaged.  This is starting to just looking silly for you now.  You are clearly out of touch here.

Here on Archive.org is also this interview where all of these quotes from you can be heard.  It is titled, “Noam Chomsky Gives an Incoherent and completely embarrassing rant about 9/11 conspiracy theories”

http://www.archive.org/details/NoamChomskyGivesAnIncoherentAndCompletelyEmbarrassingRantAbout911

Well I think I have made my point now, I am releasing a video about the 9/11 truth movement that will be readily available, which will include many of these things I pointed out in this email about you and your failure to accurately, honestly or graciously represent the 9/11 truth movement, which does include and was started by the 9/11 victim family members, also known as the Jersey Girls.  When you insult the truthers, you insult the widows of victims of September 11^th.  This is why you do your country a disservice, until you choose to change your act.

PS – Here are the victim family members and their 9/11 truth DVD: