This is from the pilot episode of A&E’s”The Beast,” which aired January 15th, 2009. The movement needs to confront Swayze on this and get him to comment. Someone also needs to confront the writers of the show and get them on camera. I post their names and photos at the end of this blog post.
[youtube -buNnQ1uZsM]
The Beast, starring Patrick Swayze and Travis Fimmel, centers on an unorthodox but effective FBI veteran, Charles Barker (Swayze), who takes on a rookie partner, Ellis Dove (Fimmel). Barker trains Dove in a hard-edged, psychologically driven approach towards undercover work, where a moment’s hesitation can lead to death.
In the premiere episode of The Beast, the mischievous Barker hazes Dove as they go undercover on their first case to infiltrate a weapons smuggling ring. Barker brilliantly manipulates situations, constantly tests his new partner’s abilities and pushes him to delve deeper into the roles of the undercover characters he creates. Although Dove takes a liking to Barker, the new job takes its toll on him. The stress and danger of being an agent quickly makes him realize that he can no longer maintain normal relationships outside of work. Yet that’s not the worst of it. The rookie is confronted with a larger challenge: An FBI Internal Affairs team feels Barker may have gone rogue and they try to enlist Dove as a double-agent in the bureau’s investigation of his mentor.
The Beast is produced by Sony Pictures Television for A&E Network.
The writers of the show are:
Vincent Angell
And co-writer
William Rotko
(no photo)
The director of the show is:
Tom Verica
As some of you might know. Daniel Sunjata, star of the hit prime time, nationwide network television show Rescue Me, is well known in the 9/11 truth movement already for having come out about 9/11. Well the show aired him talking about 9/11 being an inside job the other night, live, to millions of viewers. That is not something that anyone expected.
[youtube D5jsb4Yzd8g]
Excellent little clip, I just got back from a MLK parade in Dallas and Our Group called North Texans for 9/11 Truth passed out a 1,000 dvd’s and newspapers with truther basic info.
It was Well recieved people could not get enough, we had a guy dressed up like a flying monkey with a Bush mask and he was a big hit.
I am gonna have to tune in to that show.
i know this has noting to do with this blog but do you think the world will end in 2012 or is it a other y2k styled hoax?
who knows. Don’t waste your time in fear my brother. If we die, what is different than that of what we already experience at some point? Just know the truth and the love. Find those you want to share your life with and those who terrorize you, if you feel it, you should confront and do something about. I have chosen my path in life to confront assholes who prey on the masses and tell them off. I enjoy that.
Its gonna be a short series as Swayze is riddled with cancer
2012, end of the world, eh? It may very well be. If the truth movement -i.e. we- get our act together, the 9/11 shit may hit the 9/11 fan in 2012. And if we transcend this historic moment properly, this may, indeed, be the end of the world as we know it. If we think ahead, we may be able to effect a leap into a novel human culture, where public servants would not even remotely think of terrorizing people and would obsess themselves with public service like Wal-Mart employees with low prices.
Love,
There will I think be a flood of hollywood tryin to cash in on the 9/11 inside job and people will believe it to be the hollywood version to dismiss it like they always do. People are Sheople too and not all deserve to wake up. Imagine if 95% of americans were awake to what is really going on do you think commerce would remain no all hell would breal loose the elite would be executed and the police forces would be over run then the slums would rise and form “militias” to protect you but noone to protect you from the militias and the absolute chaos would be unbelievable. Because people are too stupid is why they need to be hurded to give themselves purpose and a worthless meaningful life. Like the Meth head truther or the crazy film maker or the Financial advisor gone mad. Or even the guys who throw all their $ into gold and survival material food water ammo. you think when it comes down to it all the guys with the preparedness will be around to fight the big gov. no they will be burrowed in their lil 30-50 pop area and shoot any uninviteds and not even bother with the man behind all this. The elite have won because people are too stupid to unite for a good cause, if we had a revolution there would be mass murder on the people appointed to be the leader because no one can agree on what to really do… So I say Fuck em all. Spend it while we can put what we can in the survival stuff hide out for a while then when the masses of idiots die off or become enslaved come out then unite with the smart ones and take it all over with a smarter cell of survivors… Period. and remember it all starts with ONE
2012 is an end of an era and the beginning of a new one. NOTHING else! we are moving from the pisces era to that of aquarius. We are in an overlap period of several hundred years and evolving our spiritual self. The days of greed and vanity are at an end. We will finally be free.
The truth shall be known and the people will make the change. We will prevail against ignorance and we will carry the fearful and ignorant kicking and screaming in to the new era.
There is nothing to fear.
I’m a no-planer. I wasn’t 6 months ago, but as an open-minded person willing to consider the evidence and contradictory views, I became convinced. It boils down to the physics. The physics of the falling towers (including WTC-7) into their own footprints at free fall speed was what convinced me that 9/11 was an inside job. However, the exposure of the doctored 9/11 video footage (“September Clues”) along with the physics of planes crashing into steel towers convinced me that no-planes actually crashed into the towers. We already knew that the Pentagon plane was no commercial aircraft. As for Shanksville Plane, the lack of wreckage, body parts, and luggage suggests it wasn’t a commercial plane either.
But back to the physics. A commercial plane is a little bit better than a flying beer can. When such an object flies into the massive steel structures like the towers, one expects some penetration, sure. But one also expects sudden deceleration and deformation of the aluminum plane as it hits that hard structure. In fact, the force of the deceleration should have torn the wings from the body and certainly the engines from the wings while still on the outside of the building. Certain plane parts should have done an accordian and/or bounced off the building, with the massive engines being the only parts with that enough mass for full penetration.
The CGI we saw on television, much like Spiderman and Superman, had the planes enter the building without deformation at the speeds they were traveling through thin air, which when you think about it, is just as hard to believe as the top floors of the towers traveling through the lower floors without resistance while turning things not just into rubble but into fine powder — a huge energy sink.
Planes traveling at their supposed speed and that low to the ground would have been deafening. Up until the repeat broadcasts worked its PSYOPS through our collective fuzzy memories, people in NY on that day did not hear the planes. The first things they heard and saw were the explosions. And if you’d watch “September Clues”, you can see where raw footage also did not show the planes and where doctored footage covered up their CGI glitches and gotchas.
So, all of this talk about “no-plane disinformation” really needs to be turned around. Those who try to debunk the no-plane concept may really be the spreaders of disinformation.
The reasons for going no-planer and CGI are numerous, like all of the variables and risks of getting a real plane to fly into the towers. More importantly, if the towers were designed to withstand such assaults, then the even greater risks would be the planes getting stuck halfway in the tower or even getting crushed & bouncing off, which in turn would not offer sufficient believable damage that would lead to believable total destruction.
Eye witnesses of the day did report hearing missiles. My speculation is that military planes fired missiles into the towers, whereby the CGI planes would be required to hide the missiles as well as provide an emotional ruse for what initiated the destruction.
We all have hazy pictures of the events of the day. When new evidence presents itself, we can and should all adjust our perception to take it into account. I get the feeling that those people calling no-planes disinformation are simply married to the initial drafts that “Loose Change” was and don’t want to go further down the rabbit hole. “September Clues” doesn’t debunk the entirety of “Loose Change”; it enhances and refines it. Much of “Loose Change” still holds up.
I concur with Maxwell Bridges… no planes. And I mean that in the sense that no planes were flown into the World Trade Centers. In discussions about 9/11 information, the demolitions of building 7 foremost, and twin towers are the best evidence, because there is so much physical evidence and peer reviewed professional papers, ala Steve Jones and the further work of AE 9/11 truth. That is solid evidence. There is no wiggle room.
While the discussion of “no planes flew into the WTC twin towers” is important, it creates an immediate dovetail for those who question even the basic premise that 9/11 was an inside job. Like myself, if you were looking for any “off ramp” from the rabbit hole then there is no debate that “no planes” delivers. Meaning, it can slow down someone’s acceptance that the 9/11 story is a well crafted myth for the masses.
However, the discussion that the WTC twin towers were exploded (as they were!) to create the effect of plane impacts, creates a VERY important reality that mainstream news is controlled. That we truly are just the audience in “Plato’s Cave” — while projected images are pasted on our, soon to be pure digital, boob tubes.
“No planes flew into the WTC twin towers” proves that the media, and the 5 companies who own it ALL, is a VERY POWERFUL TOOL. And 9/11 appeared to be a VERY frightening “test” that they can “control any message” and craft any reality.
Add to that the VERY public demolitions of the buildings, and we realize just how POWERFUL the mainstream media grasp is on the public psyche.
I think any critical thinker would agree the demolition evidence is more abundant, provable, and importantly: DIGESTABLE. However the labeling of “no planes” as disinfo or crazy stands in opposition to the label: 9/11 TRUTH.
What will President Obama do about the mountain of irrefutable evidence
proving 9/11 had nothing to do with a handful of camel drivers inspired by
some old fart on a life support machine?
I call on all intellegent readers to write and ask him.
http://www.sxolsout.110mb.com/tt.html
I just had moment to look at all this, and frankly I´d like to know more about this “no-plane” idea and the “September Clues” as well. Will someone please respond in this blog with website addresses where I can read up on this? It would be greatly appreciated.
I have watched the 2nd Edition and the Final Cut, as well as Mike Ruppert´s “Truth and Lies of 9/11″, which for those of you who haven´t seen it, is extremely informative and makes a number of connections which are truly frightening. I am still amazed by the number of people with whom I talk who simply refuse to accept what they are presented with in an objective manner. They don´t want to see the evidence because it is just too scary for their comfort levels. How many of you have heard the “I don´t believe…” beginning to that spiel? I´m at the point where I just want to say, “That´s okay, I´m not asking you for faith or belief, I´m asking you to look at documented evidence and use a thought process to arrive at a conclusion.” But usually I mention that they should just watch the videos and keep in mind that they´re not telling you who or what did it, they´re telling you why the official version just doesn´t fit. Anyway, it´s good to know that there are others out there who are looking into this more deeply.
One last thing: some reading for anyone interested: “The Family” by Jeff Sharlet, a very informative account of elite American fundamentalism which should get us all spooked; “The Shock Doctrine” by Naomi Klein, absolutely essential — just give her the benefit of the doubt when it comes to her views on 9/11, the rest of the book is a stunning pillar of support for everything that is being talked about on this blog; and Jeremy Scahill´s book “Blackwater” so that you can see where your tax dollars have been going during the coup d´etat of the last eight years in your country.
Oh, and let´s hope that Barack delivers the goods — the beginning is hopeful, even though in my heart of hearts I would love to see Ralph Nader as pres. Cheers to all, happy 2009, and keep the truth rolling.
Craig G. and All,
Just Google “September Clues” for the plane video analysis series. Watch several of the videos you’ll find there and then, to get a feel for cons on what you’ve seen, I recommend checking out this debunking piece on it.
http://truthaction.org/debunkingseptemberclues.pdf
Have to admit the overall tone of the debunk piece above leads me to question it’s motives. Here is another links page to browse from a search of 911scholars.org:
http://twilightpines.com//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=126&Itemid=5
For myself, I’ve so far found the September Clues no-planes/mass media CGI deception to be a plausible theory that fits pretty well with some other parts of the giant truth puzzle being assembled by the movement. But like any other 911 theories, I would not take it as “gospel” to the exclusion of other possibilities until it has been further verified.
For a great analysis of why so many non-truthers’ minds are still so hard to breach, may I recommend Kevin Ryan’s excellent piece, Conspiracies and Confabulation: Tales from two Naomis-
http://www.911blogger.com/node/18673
At our tabling events at our local downtown Farmer’s Market, we tell folks we don’t know what really happened, but ask them to take a look at the questions raised about the official story, study and decide for themselves.
Keep it up everyone!!
To Maxwell Bridges:
I agree 100% and welcome aboard.
To Craig Bugden:
You can download “September Clues” here free of charge
http://thesocialservice.it/spt/download.asp
To Aaron:
In regards to your last paragraph, I would have to strongly disagree.
You stated;
“I think any critical thinker would agree the demolition evidence is more abundant, provable, and importantly: DIGESTABLE. However the labeling of “no planes” as disinfo or crazy stands in opposition to the label: 9/11 TRUTH.”
What demolition evidence is more abundant? The crime scene along with all of the evidence is GONE!
So without the angle cut steel beams, chemical analysis, eyewitnesses, etc.. provability would be difficult
at best. Pictures and video footage are the only forms of evidence we have. And since the demolition
charges are inside and underneath the buildings they are not visible on video. Even though we see the
squibs and tiny explosions resulting from the charges, NIST blames that on compressed air pockets caused
by the pan-caking effect. So the best evidence caught on tape would be the implosions of the three buildings.
Which should be enough proof by themselves to get a guilty verdict from a jury. But who knows nowadays???
However, the No Plane Theory has 37 (and still growing) video clips of evidence. All of them either contradict
each other and/or break the very laws of nature and physics. Eight years later and the ‘perps’ are still trying
to get it right by releasing ‘newly found’ footage. But in doing so, actually incriminates themselves even more. On numerous video clips showing impact, it is easily proven without a shadow of doubt that these are
CGI and not real airplanes. There is plenty of other facts concerning the flights, the planes, the passengers,
their family members, eyewitnesses, etc… It goes on and on and on. But one thing for sure is that they
can NOT bury all of the evidence of this crime like they did in Waco, OK City, and the WTC, because thousands of Americans have it recorded on video tapes. And that is the ONLY thing that the ‘perps’ are
concerned about! They have already pulled all of the incriminating original footage of the CGI airplanes
from the archives and replaced it with edited versions blocking crash scenes with their own logos.
The NPT (no plane theory) exposes the real enemy, the strongest part of any tyrannical government, its
control center of propaganda…the mass media networks! So you can count on ridicule and slander from
them if you are a no-planer because they can’t debunk the truth. And for those of you who are NOT
no-planers, please watch some crash footage frame by frame with an open mind and the courage to
withstand peer pressure. God help us all.
Oh, my…are we going to No-Plane land? I am so thrilled by September Clues that I am screening it for the public in February (in Orange County, South of LA). September Clues is complicated, double-checking it in its entirety would be a huge task, but it is amazingly convincing.
Who knows? This crass Beast clip may be a response to it. SC’s thesis is that the video evidence suggests that WTC was really hit by missiles and “we the viewers” were hit by so-called “live pictures” and other exercises in peppering reality with graphic images.
Love,
Right am feeling like making comment here after a while in the wilderness.
Dylan or ‘enigs’ as I knew him on LetsRoll has done incredible work that is irressistable.
Listen to me people….Authenticated audio shows two impact events on the North Tower 9.2secs apart. First the plane hit then subterrainean explosions fatally cracked and ripped the six central-support columns from the bedrock. Not only that. Dozens of workers in the basements experienced. Heard. Saw. And received injuries from devices pre-set and mis-timed with the actual plane impacts. Many such as Willie Rodriguez fortunately lived to tell the tale.
Planes did hit the towers. Apologies but some of you yanks’ always manage to muddy the issue.
Respect to Dylan.
Rgds,
Oz
Lots of disinfo’agents here jesus get some balls people…
Did hundreds of basement workers just imagine two explosions 9.2 seconds apart?
Can CGI cause basements to blow up just before planes are seen. Felt. Heard. And recorded on audio tape impacting the towers?
Somebody. Anybody try proving to me and the world that planes did not hit the twin-towers!
Jesus christ I need a drink. A strong one…
Cheers.
Osmosis,
I haven’t noticed any intentional disinformation posted by anyone so far on this thread.
And just because two or more people disagree over certain issues, factors, etc.. usually
doesn’t mean anything more than that they just disagree! period.
Also, what’s up with all of the name calling and false accusations going on lately? And
if you are referring to ‘no-planers’ as disinfo agents, what do you base that on? What
proof do you have? Since you made the accusation, you have the task of proving it.
But I guarantee that won’t happen because you canNOT debunk the truth! However,
your apology will be accepted after you finally get it.
You asked:
“Did hundreds of basement workers just imagine two explosions 9.2 seconds apart?”
What does that have to do with a CGI plane being sync’d up with an actual explosion?
“Can CGI cause basements to blow up just before planes are seen.”
Usually explosives of some kind would cause basements or whatever to blow up just before
or after planes are seen or not seen. You do realize that the entire WTC complex was
wired with explosives prior to Sept. 11,’01 don’t you? And the whole reason for the CGI
planes was to do what real planes could not do ie…penetrate steel and concrete, then with
the warmth of a kerosene lantern supposedly melt the steel inner core which in turn caused
the towers to collapse in order to re-focus attention away from the very obvious demolition
explosions that were taking place.
“Felt. Heard. And recorded on audio tape impacting the towers?”
Hmmm, you’ve got nearly every sense going on here except the main one of sight.
No one ‘felt’ any airplane, most phony witnesses never mention hearing any plane loudness .
Even most of the live on the scene reporters not only don’t hear any plane, they didn’t see one either.
They were corrected by in studio anchors about seeing a supposed plane hitting the tower on their
TV screen. So an audio tape, not VIDEO, records tower impact. Would that sound like an explosion?
“Somebody. Anybody try proving to me and the world that planes did not hit the twin-towers!”
CORRECTION…., since you seem to be parrotting the Official Government Plane Theory (OGPT),
you are accusing 19 people of hijacking 4 planes and alledging that one plane crashed into WTC 1,
another plane crashed into the Pentagon, another plane crashed in PA, and the last one crashed
into WTC 2. However, NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE whatsoever supports any one of the four outlandish
conspiracy theories. The laughable planted evidence, that magically appeared from time to time,
cast even more doubt of the validity of any large airplane crashes taking place at all on 9-11-01.
So therefore, it is the responsibility of the government and/or those who espouse the OGPT to
prove to me and the world that planes DID hit the twin-towers and/or the Pentagon using any
verifiable bonafide evidence available such as surveilance/security tapes, as well as the slam
dunk evidence stored underground at Iron Mountain. All the crash footage that was broadcasted
on TV has been proven to be fake so therefore inadmissible as evidence.
“Jesus christ I need a drink. A strong one…”
Now that’s a sobering thought.
[...] 9-11 ‘no planes‘ Propaganda on A&E’s “The Beast,” Starring Patrick…Jan 15, 2009 … 9-11 ‘no planes’ Propaganda on A&E’s “The Beast,” Starring Patrick Swayze, Whats Up With Network Television Launching 9/11 Info In Their … [...]